Addressing Risk

Posted in management by Christopher R. Wirz on Thu Jul 25 2013

Risk management is a crucial aspect of project management that involves identifying and addressing potential risks that can impact the success of a project. Risks can be positive or negative, with positive risks (opportunities) leading to benefits such as reduced time and cost, improved performance, increased market share, or enhanced reputation, and negative risks (threats). The results can include delays, cost overruns, technical failures, performance shortcomings, or loss of reputation.

Effective risk management involves continually identifying and evaluating both internal and external risks throughout the life cycle of a project. The goal is to maximize positive risks and minimize negative ones, as well as to keep overall project risk within an acceptable range through strategies such as reducing drivers of threats, promoting drivers of opportunities, and increasing the probability of achieving project objectives.

An organization's risk attitude, appetite, and threshold also play a role in how risks are addressed. Risk attitude refers to the overall approach an organization takes towards risk, while risk appetite describes the degree of uncertainty an organization is willing to accept in pursuit of a reward. Risk threshold is the measure of acceptable variation around an objective that reflects the risk appetite of the organization and stakeholders.

In order to effectively address risks, responses should be appropriate for the significance of the risk, cost-effective, realistic within the project context, agreed upon by relevant stakeholders, and owned by a responsible person. It is also important to consider the potential impact of risks on different levels, including the enterprise, portfolio, program, project, and product.

Organizations that proactively address risks through consistent risk evaluation, planning, and implementation often find it to be a more cost-effective approach compared to reacting to risks after they have materialized. By effectively managing risks, project teams can increase the chances of success and achieve their desired outcomes.

Key concepts:

  • Risks are uncertain events or conditions that, if it occur, can have a positive or negative effect on one or more objectives. Positive risks (opportunities) can lead to benefits such as reduced time and cost, improved performance, increased market share, or enhanced reputation, while negative risks (threats) can result in issues such as delays, cost overruns, technical failures, performance shortcomings, or loss of reputation.
  • Risk management is the process of identifying, evaluating, and addressing potential risks that can impact the success of a project. The goal is to maximize positive risks and minimize negative ones, as well as to keep overall project risk within an acceptable range.
  • Risk attitude is the overall approach an organization takes towards risk.
  • Risk appetite is the degree of uncertainty an organization is willing to accept in pursuit of a reward.
  • Risk threshold is the measure of acceptable variation around an objective that reflects the risk appetite of the organization and stakeholders.
  • Risk response is an action taken to address a identified risk. Responses should be appropriate for the significance of the risk, cost-effective, realistic within the project context, agreed upon by relevant stakeholders, and owned by a responsible person.
  • Risk evaluation is the process of identifying and evaluating potential risks.
  • Risk planning is the process of developing strategies to address identified risks.
  • Positive risks (opportunities) are risks that have the potential to lead to benefits such as reduced time and cost, improved performance, increased market share, or enhanced reputation.
  • Negative risks (threats) are risks that have the potential to result in issues such as delays, cost overruns, technical failures, performance shortcomings, or loss of reputation.
  • Overall project risk is the effect of uncertainty on the project as a whole, arising from all sources of uncertainty, including individual risks, and representing the exposure of stakeholders to the implications of variations in project outcome, both positive and negative.
  • Enterprise, portfolio, program, project, and product levels of risk are different levels at which risks can exist within an organization. The project level refers to risks specific to a particular project, while the program level refers to risks that can potentially enhance or diminish benefits realization and value within a program. The portfolio level refers to risks that can potentially enhance or diminish the overall value of a portfolio of related or unrelated work and the realization of business objectives. The enterprise and product levels refer to risks at the organization-wide and product levels, respectively.
  • Proactive risk management is a proactive approach to risk management that involves consistent risk evaluation, planning, and implementation.
  • Cost-effectiveness of risk management is the idea that proactively addressing risks through consistent risk evaluation, planning, and implementation can be a more cost-effective approach compared to reacting to risks after they have materialized.